Post Top Ad

12:20 PM

What Hath Technology Wrought?

by , in
Technology shifts occur at breakneck speed these days. Then again, they always have. I thought of that recently with news that the last operating telegraph system in the world is shutting down operations.

The last telegram is scheduled to go July 14, 2013, in India. That’s nearly 150 years after Samuel Morse sent the first one.  A pretty good run for a communications technology.

Telegrams were once essential to communications. “Giant in the Shadows: The Life of Robert T. Lincoln” is the definitive biography of the only surviving son of Abraham Lincoln. In it author Jason Emerson writes eloquently about  how President Lincoln communicated about the horrors, successes and failures of Civil War battles via the telegraph. Emerson traces how Robert Todd Lincoln himself in 1900 tracked the assassination of President William McKinley via a series of telegrams. In an era when mail delivery truly was “snail mail,” the speed of a telegram must have seemed breathtaking.

In the 20th century when the telephone surpassed the telegraph for speed, Americans used the older technology for impact rather than immediacy. Often the first news of a marriage, a birth or death came by telegram, with the sender aiming for the impact of a typed, hand-delivered document confirming the news.

But as eight-tracks were replaced by cassettes,  and cassettes by CDs, and CDs by digital music, the telegram’s final death blow was the fax and later email. Telegraph service in the U.S. ceased seven years ago.

I have more than a passing acquaintance with telegraphy. Earlier in my career the company for which I worked, and later was a part-owner, contracted with the Western Union Company to take over operation of the telegraph company’s downtown public offices. These were large, centrally located offices where consumers could wire or receive money, send a message via Western Union’s telex system, or send a telegram. In fact, most communities of any consequence had a Western Union office.

We were a small company so as a manager I sometimes had to deliver telegrams or send telex messages. The telex messages were typed out on a teletypewriter called a “32,” since all alphanumeric combinations had to be made on a keyboard limited to 32 spring-loaded keys. The fastest keystrokers pounded out the messages with their two index fingers. The actual message input produced a thin paper tape with raised dots similar to Braille. These paper tapes were then reversed and fed back into the machine, which electronically reproduced and sent the message via dial-up phone lines.

By the early 1990s messaging like telegrams, telex and TWX (Teletype Writer Exchange) had largely been replaced by newer, less expensive technologies like the fax machine and eventually email. The precipitous drop in the cost of telecommunications, including telephone calls after the breakup of the old Bell network, priced Western Union out of the message business.

By the 1990s the advent of prepaid cards,  other payment schemes built on the trusted third-party concept pioneered by Western Union in the 1800s, and overnight delivery services killed much of the money transfer business. The assets of Western Union, including its name, were eventually acquired by First Data Corporation--itself a modern spin-off from American Express, which pioneered the large scale travelers checksystem in the 19th century.

Western Union has survived by reinventing itself with new products and services, like online money transfer, prepaid cards and online bill payment.


It’s easy to look back on technologies like telegraphy, money transfer, or travelers checks and think of them as quaint throwbacks to ages gone by. But technology isn’t like that. Every technology is a pilot program for the technology that eventually succeeds it. Payment technologies like online bill payment and presentment or prepaid cards owe some measure of their success to those brave 19th century pioneers who risked their lives stringing copper across a vast continent. And to telegraph operators and keypunchers that made the Western Union office as much a part of their community as the corner bank or the post office. 
1:41 PM

What's Behind Those ATM Fees?

by , in

What's Behind Those ATM Fees-and Why Should I Care?

Most consumers who have bank accounts have had occasion to use an ATM. While many ATMs can multi-task—accept deposits, transfer money, etc.—most people just use them for taking out cash. There are over 400,000 ATMs operating in the U.S. today. About half are controlled by banks and the other half by independent ATM owners or merchants.

If you’re of a certain age and remember writing checks to “Cash” and trying to find a bank that would take your check when you needed some "street money," as we say, an ATM is nothing short of a miracle. But the downside of ATMs in getting stuck with the fees charged to use them.

A group of U.S. senators thinks that downside is pretty steep, so they commissioned the General Accountability Office to study them. The GAO, in a report published this past April not only looked into fees, but also into the business dynamics of the ATM industry. What they found may surprise you.

The “fee” charged to use an ATM will vary by the owner, much in the same way that rental car fees or hotel rates differ by company based on that company’s business case. In the case of ATMs, there is no “fee,” but a series of fees. For example, using the ATMs owned by the bank that issued your ATM card is generally part of the deal. But if you use a machine not owned by your bank, you’re likely to be assessed a surcharge of a couple of bucks. In addition, when you use someone else’s machine, your bank is likely to charge you an additional “foreign” fee for having to tell another ATM owner that you have enough money to cover the transaction.

On top of those, your bank will have to pay the ATM owner an “interchange” fee to compensate the foreign owner for the use of his machine. Interchange fees charged by banks to merchants for accepting their debit cards have been become such a bone of contention that Congress in 2010 instituted price caps on them.
There are also “switch” and “acquiring” fees that are paid to the electronic networks that move the transactions back and forth between banks and ATMs.

If all of this sounds pretty arcane, it is. The GAO has tried to sort through the details in its April 2013 report. There are really three factors that underlie the ATM fees. The first is competition. Consumers may pay a certain surcharge in an area where there is an ATM on every corner. On the other hand, use an ATM where the owner has a captive audience—such as a mall or an airport, where it may be the exclusive provider—and you’ll probably pay more.

The second factor that drives fees is the cost to operate a certain machine. Independently owned machines placed in areas where they are subject to damage or additional security requirements are likely to feature higher surcharges to help recover the higher cost of operation. Banks, which may use ATMs to advertise other services or attract new customers, may feature lower fees because costs may be offset by other sources of revenue.

A third factor is usage. The more transactions that flow through an ATM the greater the base over which the operating costs can be spread. A machine that sees less activity has fewer units (transactions) over which to spread its costs, resulting in higher pricing per unit at that machine.

Consumers who wish to lessen the cost of ATM usage have a few options. Many banks and ATM owners belong to so-called “surcharge-free” networks. These networks work out deals with ATM owners that allow consumers to use their machines free of surcharging. Consumers can also restrict their ATM usage to their own bank’s machines. This will eliminate surcharges and foreign fees. Third, consumers can work ahead on their cash needs and request cash back when they use their card at a merchant point-of-sale terminal so they don’t have to visit an ATM quite as often. There’s no need to be paying top dollar every time you use an ATM when these options are available.

If this sounds like humdrum Consumer Economics 101, that’s because it is. These are the same pricing decisions that any business—large or small—goes through. American consumers are pretty savvy but they need to remember that when they pay to use an ATM what they’re buying is convenience. With a little information they can figure out how much ATM convenience they want to buy.

  Nevertheless, look for Congress to use the GAO’s extensive report as justification for rounding up the usual financial industry suspects for hearings on the subject of ATM fees. If past is prologue expect significant political pressure on ATM owners and their profitability. And if that results in elimination of the least profitable of those 400,000 ATMs, the convenience that ATMs offer will become a lot less convenient for consumers—and a little bit more expensive.