Post Top Ad

10:54 AM

Re-regulating to help ensure that public benefits are used to move beneficiaries toward self-sufficiency

by , in
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) this month proposed eliminating a loophole that allows states to make recipients of minimal amounts of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (welfare) benefits automatically eligible to participate in USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as food stamps).

Regular readers of The Lobster are familiar with how these pages have documented the steps that USDA has taken to increase the integrity of the SNAP program, including the elimination of opportunities for fraud and abuse of the program.

The proposed rule published in the Federal Register would limit SNAP/TANF automatic eligibility to households that receive substantial, ongoing TANF-funded benefits aimed at helping families move towards self-sufficiency.

 This loophole has increased the number of SNAP recipients in some states by include people who receive unneeded assistance. In a news release trumpeting the regulatory revision, USDA calls the problem, which the rule change is intended to correct, egregious.

 The Department claims that billions of tax dollars are being squandered through this loophole. As an example, its release points to the case of a millionaire receiving benefits in Minnesota. In the eyes of the Department, the new regulation will allow government to deliver SNAP consistently to only to those most in need of the benefit.

The release cites Department Secretary Sonny Perdue in promoting the new regulation “For too long, this loophole has been used to effectively bypass important eligibility guidelines. Too often, states have misused this flexibility without restraint,”

Secretary Perdue added, “The American people expect their government to be fair, efficient, and to have integrity – just as they do in their own homes, businesses, and communities. That is why we are changing the rules, preventing abuse of a critical safety net system, so those who need food assistance the most are the only ones who receive it.”

1:56 PM

Creating Access to Capital for Low-income Consumers

by , in
A number of years ago, a financial-industry colleague of mine and I devised a consumer-finance alternative to check-cashing services, payday loans, and rent-to-own stores.

The plan we developed was designed to provide a gateway to capital for consumers with limited assets and low income.

Our inverse principle was that everyone, no matter how poor, owns something of value. and the poorer the consumer the more valuable that thing is to him. And if that thing were used to collateralize a loan, the more likely the borrower would be to repay the loan.

What is needed is a forward-thinking financial institution willing to extend credit based on such collateral. Since the collateral, whether an old car, a personal assistant, or a mobile phone is the one thing that allows the consumer to tolerate his poverty, it would be highly unlikely that he will default on the small loan.

This will allow the borrower to escape the maw of check cashers, payday lenders and and others in the non-bank financial-service industry that provide capital to poorer consumers at an unbearable cost. Under this scenario, there is no vig, no hidden cost to the borrower.

The financial institution could be a bank, credit union, or even a check casher.